A recent SPIVA report indicates that nearly three-quarters of large-cap active funds underperformed a blended benchmark over a 10-year period. The analysis attributes this trend to narrowing skill gaps, the role of luck, and efficiently inefficient market structures.

Nearly three-fourth of large-cap active funds underperformed a blended LargeMidCap benchmark over a 10-year period, according to the 2025 report by SPIVA (S&P Indices Versus Active). The report highlights ongoing challenges faced by active funds in consistently beating their benchmarks.

Alpha represents the excess returns that a portfolio generates over an appropriate benchmark, calculated as portfolio return minus the benchmark return. According to the analysis, alpha is primarily a function of skill and luck. Skill is determined by knowledge—typically acquired through credentialing exams—and information, which refers to corporate news and macroeconomic developments that guide investment decisions.

Over the years, the difference in skill levels among portfolio managers has narrowed. Portfolio managers now generally hold similar credentials, and market participants rely on publicly disseminated information to execute trades. Consequently, differences in returns between the worst-performing and best-performing funds cannot be fully explained by skill alone, pointing to a significant role for luck in alpha generation.

The data suggests that even a skilled portfolio manager can experience bad luck, making consistent alpha generation difficult. Additionally, market structure plays a critical role. Markets are described as efficiently inefficient—meaning assets are mispriced, but such mispricing does not persist because large volumes of capital chase the same universe of stocks.

With accessible computational power and uniform access to information across market participants, the opportunity for a portfolio manager to consistently identify mispriced stocks ahead of competitors remains small. The findings indicate that the combination of luck and an efficiently inefficient market structure heavily influences fund performance.

For individual investors, fund underperformance tied to bad luck can intersect with the time horizon of life goals, potentially leading to a shortfall in terminal wealth. Financial planning considerations often account for the reality that negative alpha can have a more pronounced psychological impact than an equivalent positive alpha.

"The findings from the latest SPIVA report underscore the inherent challenges of active portfolio management in today's transparent and fast-moving markets. As information symmetry increases and market efficiency improves, relying solely on active fund management to consistently generate alpha becomes increasingly difficult. For entrepreneurs and business leaders managing personal wealth or corporate treasuries, this data emphasizes the importance of disciplined asset allocation, realistic return expectations, and a clear understanding of market structures when making long-term financial decisions." — Dr. Shishir Gupta, Founder & CEO, StartupLanes

Recent StartupLanes Articles

Browse through our 30 latest publications on venture capital, startups, and angel investing.