As insurance coverage for AYUSH treatments expands in India under IRDAI guidelines, policyholders continue to face claim disputes. Industry insights highlight that these issues typically arise from a lack of awareness regarding sub-limits, facility accreditation, and required documentation.

Health insurance policies in India have evolved to include coverage for AYUSH treatments—covering Ayurveda, Yoga & Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha, and Homeopathy. The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) has progressively strengthened the regulatory framework for this segment, issuing dedicated guidelines in January 2024 to promote broader and more consistent coverage across health insurance products.

Despite this regulatory push, AYUSH-related claim disputes continue to occur. According to industry reports, these disputes generally stem from policyholders lacking awareness of specific policy conditions rather than the outright exclusion of AYUSH treatments by insurers.

A primary cause of disputes is the assumption that every policy provides AYUSH coverage up to the full sum insured. While newer products often offer broader coverage, many older health insurance policies still carry sub-limits. For instance, a policy with a sum insured of ₹10 lakh may restrict AYUSH treatment claims to ₹2 lakh, a limitation policyholders frequently discover only during the claim settlement stage.

The choice of treatment facility is another critical factor. Health insurance typically covers NABH AYUSH treatments only when received at a recognized AYUSH hospital or healthcare facility meeting prescribed regulatory standards, including accreditation. Wellness centers, spas, rejuvenation retreats, and general therapy facilities are generally ineligible for insurance reimbursement. IRDAI has defined specific requirements for AYUSH hospitals, covering infrastructure, qualified practitioners, in-patient facilities, and medical record maintenance.

Furthermore, treatments must follow recognized protocols and be medically indicated. Claims can face questioning if the care is primarily for wellness, preventive care, or lifestyle improvement rather than a diagnosed medical condition requiring hospitalization.

Documentation challenges also frequently delay or lead to the rejection of claims. Incomplete admission records, missing prescriptions, inadequate discharge summaries, and improperly prepared bills can hinder processing. Pricing discrepancies present additional hurdles, as instances have been reported where AYUSH centers charge rates significantly higher than IRDAI-specified limits. Insurers may limit payouts to reasonable and admissible amounts under the policy, leaving policyholders to cover the remaining balance.

To avoid these complications, policyholders are advised to review policy wordings for sub-limits, verify the recognition status of the healthcare facility, seek pre-authorisation for cashless treatments, and prefer network hospitals. Maintaining complete medical records and clarifying admissibility doubts with insurers prior to treatment are essential steps for a smoother claims experience.

"The expansion of health insurance to cover AYUSH treatments is a positive step for India's healthcare ecosystem, but it requires greater financial literacy among consumers. Many policyholders fail to realize that coverage often comes with specific sub-limits and strict facility accreditation rules. Before opting for alternative treatments, it is crucial to read the policy wording carefully, verify hospital accreditations, and confirm pre-authorisation requirements to avoid unexpected out-of-pocket expenses during claim settlements." — Dr. Shishir Gupta, Founder & CEO, StartupLanes

Recent StartupLanes Articles

Browse through our 30 latest publications on venture capital, startups, and angel investing.